About the Center on Policy Attitudes
Mission: Giving the Public a Greater Voice
It is a widespread myth that Washington policymakers are highly reactive
to public opinion. In fact, various studies have shown that policymakers
have a poor understanding of US public attitudes and frequently make
decisions that are inconsistent with the views of the majority of
Americans. Furthermore, the American public feels it is not being
heard and feels marginalized from the policymaking process. During
the last few decades, studies have shown a sharp erosion in Americans'
belief that the US government listens to them and acts in the public's
interest. This disconnect between the public and policymakers interferes
with the democratic process.
The Center on Policy Attitudes was created to help give a greater
voice to the American public in the policymaking process. Founded
in 1992, COPA seeks to deepen understanding of American public attitudes
by:
- conducting in-depth nationwide polls, focus groups, and interviews;
- integrating its findings together with data from other organizations
into a coherent analysis of majority opinion;
- and actively communicating its findings to the policymaking community,
the media, academia and the public.
Giving the public a greater voice is not meant to imply that policymakers
simply should make policy according to the polls. However, it is possible
-- through polls and other means -- to understand the public's underlying
values and bring those values to bear on the policymaking process.
The failure to do so falls short of democratic ideals and contributes
to the feeling that Washington is out of touch with the world outside
the Beltway.
Implicit in this view is the idea that the voice of the public has
value and even wisdom. Central to the notion of democracy is the idea
that a process of governance informed by the perspectives of those
governed is not only most apt to be viewed as legitimate, but will
bring to bear on public policy the greatest amount of intelligence
-- more than can be found in any one part of society.
Return to Menu
Discerning the Public's Underlying Values
One reason that policymakers have trouble understanding the public
is that they frequently confront poll results that seem contradictory
and unstable. This contributes to a widespread tendency among policymakers
and the media to view the public as incoherent, erratic and highly
reactive to emotional events. This view of the public was also held
by academics in the early years of public opinion research, but subsequent
in-depth research revealed it to be a myth. Majority public opinion
is actually quite coherent, stable and responsive to long-term considerations
and collective interests.
The Center on Policy Attitudes seeks to discern the coherent voice
of the majority public obscured by seemingly disparate poll results.
By carefully examining the wording of various poll questions, by posing
new questions that elicit more nuanced attitudes, and by examining
and controlling for the public's misperceptions, COPA seeks to reveal
the deeper values that underlie apparent inconsistencies.
Return to Menu
Challenging the Conventional Wisdom
Even when policymakers and journalists agree on how the public feels
about an issue, their perceptions may be incorrect. COPA makes a point
of questioning assumptions and has found a number of cases in which
the public was, indeed, being misperceived.
For example, COPA refuted the myth that the public intrinsically
opposes foreign aid. Indeed, polls showed that strong majorities felt
the US was spending too much on foreign aid. However, COPA went further
and asked Americans to estimate how much of the federal budget was
spent on foreign aid. The median estimate was 15-20% - when the actual
amount is 1%. Asked how much it should be, the median response was
5-10%, hardly a sign that the public opposes foreign aid.
More broadly, COPA challenged the widespread notion that the public
is showing renewed isolationism in the wake of the Cold War. Through
an extensive study, in conjunction with the Center for International
and Security Studies at the University of Maryland, it was demonstrated
that even when members of the policy community who had this perception
were given the opportunity to propose their own poll questions, the
public still did not show the assumed tendency toward isolationism.
This study resulted in the recently published book, Misreading
the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism.
Return to Menu
Breaking New Ground in the Study of the Public
The Center on Policy Attitudes has developed innovative methods for
discerning how the public' s values come to bear on areas of public
policy. These new methods seek to simulate the deliberative process
policymakers go through in making policy decisions. For example, COPA
polls not only ask questions in a neutral fashion, they also present
strongly stated pro and con arguments -- the kind that policymakers
hear. COPA' s polls require respondents to make tradeoffs, similar
to those policymakers must make -- for example, asking them to try
to balance components of the federal budget. Efforts are made to find
out if attitudes are being influenced by misperceptions and to determine
the effects of correct information. COPA' s approach uniquely includes
members of the policymaking community in poll question development
to ensure questions are balanced and reflect the prevailing policy
debate.
Return to Menu
Informing Key Audiences
The Center on Policy Attitudes actively works to communicate its
findings to members of the policymaking community, the media and academia.
It distributes its reports to members of Congress and the Executive
Branch as well as to policy research institutes. COPA personnel have
testified before Congress and given briefings to the White House,
State Department, USIA, USAID, NATO, the United Nations, the European
Commission and US embassies abroad. COPA's findings have been reported
in most major news outlets, including The New York Times, The Washington
Post, The Wall Street Journal, International Herald-Tribune, The Los
Angeles Times, The Christian Science Monitor, National Journal, the
Associated Press, Reuters , CNN, NBC, BBC, NPR, C-SPAN and others.
Return to Menu
Foundation Sponsors
COPA's projects have been funded by:
- Ford Foundation
- Rockefeller Foundation
- Rockefeller Brothers Fund
- Tides Foundation
- Ford Foundation
- German Marshall Fund of the United States
- Compton Foundation
- Carnegie Corporation
- Benton Foundation
- Ben and Jerry's Foundation
- Americans Talk Issues Foundation
- Circle Foundation
- Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
- Joyce Foundation
Return to Menu
INTERNSHIPS AND JOBS AT COPA
The Center on Policy Attitudes (COPA) and its Program on International
Policy Attitudes (affiliated with the University of Maryland) conduct
research on public attitudes on public policy issues through nationwide
polls and focus groups. They also study policymakers perceptions
of the public. COPA actively disseminates its findings to policymakers
and the media, as well as to the academic community. In addition to
its studies, COPA is developing a major web site that will offer current
and comprehensive analyses of data on public attitudes on a broad
array of policy issues.
Internships
- COPA has no open positions at this time.
Jobs
- COPA has no open positions at this time.
Return to Menu